Antique sculptures often feel resolved the moment they are lifted. Cold weight, dark patina, and classical forms strongly suggest cast bronze, age, and enduring value, creating confidence that feels tactile and convincing. Online listings, gallery descriptions, and estate narratives reinforce this impression by relying on surface cues rather than material verification. Understanding how antique sculptures are actually evaluated matters because mistaking appearance for composition can lead to overpayment, misrepresentation, and significant credibility risk once material facts are examined.
DJR Real vs. Fake™ guides are designed to help readers understand what commonly goes wrong before money, reputation, or documentation is committed.
This guide explains how professionals think about antique sculptures, focusing on:
Where public assumptions about bronze break down
Why patina, color, and weight are unreliable indicators of material
How resin and composite copies are engineered to feel conclusive
Where uncertainty enters when surface realism is treated as proof
Inside this guide, readers will learn how to:
Separate visual realism from material composition
Recognize why cold, heavy sculptures may still be non-metallic
Understand how casting method affects category, durability, and risk
Identify when restraint is the correct decision
Avoid paying cast-bronze prices for resin or composite copies
Decide when professional escalation may or may not make sense
This guide does not authenticate items or assign value.
Its purpose is to restore clarity, enforce restraint, and prevent irreversible mistakes at the decision stage.
Digital Download — PDF • 3 Pages • Instant Access
Antique sculptures often feel resolved the moment they are lifted. Cold weight, dark patina, and classical forms strongly suggest cast bronze, age, and enduring value, creating confidence that feels tactile and convincing. Online listings, gallery descriptions, and estate narratives reinforce this impression by relying on surface cues rather than material verification. Understanding how antique sculptures are actually evaluated matters because mistaking appearance for composition can lead to overpayment, misrepresentation, and significant credibility risk once material facts are examined.
DJR Real vs. Fake™ guides are designed to help readers understand what commonly goes wrong before money, reputation, or documentation is committed.
This guide explains how professionals think about antique sculptures, focusing on:
Where public assumptions about bronze break down
Why patina, color, and weight are unreliable indicators of material
How resin and composite copies are engineered to feel conclusive
Where uncertainty enters when surface realism is treated as proof
Inside this guide, readers will learn how to:
Separate visual realism from material composition
Recognize why cold, heavy sculptures may still be non-metallic
Understand how casting method affects category, durability, and risk
Identify when restraint is the correct decision
Avoid paying cast-bronze prices for resin or composite copies
Decide when professional escalation may or may not make sense
This guide does not authenticate items or assign value.
Its purpose is to restore clarity, enforce restraint, and prevent irreversible mistakes at the decision stage.
Digital Download — PDF • 3 Pages • Instant Access
Image 1 of 1