Antique ceramics often feel settled the moment they are examined. Hand-applied decoration, irregular forms, and visible wear suggest individual craftsmanship and early production, encouraging confident assumptions about studio origin. Online listings, estate descriptions, and casual attribution frequently reinforce this belief by using terms like “hand-painted” or “artisan” without explaining how ceramics were actually produced. Understanding how antique ceramics are properly evaluated matters because mistaking factory output for studio work can lead to overpayment, misrepresentation, and credibility problems when authorship claims are later scrutinized.
DJR Real vs. Fake™ guides are designed to help readers understand what commonly goes wrong before money, reputation, or documentation is committed.
This guide explains how professionals think about antique ceramics, focusing on:
Where public assumptions about hand-made appearance break down
Why factory production often includes hand-applied elements
How studio work and organized output can visually overlap
Where uncertainty enters when craftsmanship is treated as proof
Inside this guide, readers will learn how to:
Distinguish hand involvement from production model
Recognize why hand-painted decoration does not confirm studio authorship
Understand how production context affects credibility and risk
Identify when restraint is the correct decision
Avoid representing ceramics as studio work without confirmation
Decide when professional escalation may or may not make sense
This guide does not authenticate items or assign value.
Its purpose is to restore clarity, enforce restraint, and prevent irreversible mistakes at the decision stage.
Digital Download — PDF • 4 Pages • Instant Access
Antique ceramics often feel settled the moment they are examined. Hand-applied decoration, irregular forms, and visible wear suggest individual craftsmanship and early production, encouraging confident assumptions about studio origin. Online listings, estate descriptions, and casual attribution frequently reinforce this belief by using terms like “hand-painted” or “artisan” without explaining how ceramics were actually produced. Understanding how antique ceramics are properly evaluated matters because mistaking factory output for studio work can lead to overpayment, misrepresentation, and credibility problems when authorship claims are later scrutinized.
DJR Real vs. Fake™ guides are designed to help readers understand what commonly goes wrong before money, reputation, or documentation is committed.
This guide explains how professionals think about antique ceramics, focusing on:
Where public assumptions about hand-made appearance break down
Why factory production often includes hand-applied elements
How studio work and organized output can visually overlap
Where uncertainty enters when craftsmanship is treated as proof
Inside this guide, readers will learn how to:
Distinguish hand involvement from production model
Recognize why hand-painted decoration does not confirm studio authorship
Understand how production context affects credibility and risk
Identify when restraint is the correct decision
Avoid representing ceramics as studio work without confirmation
Decide when professional escalation may or may not make sense
This guide does not authenticate items or assign value.
Its purpose is to restore clarity, enforce restraint, and prevent irreversible mistakes at the decision stage.
Digital Download — PDF • 4 Pages • Instant Access
Image 1 of 1