Authenticating a pre-2000 Tiffany & Co. engagement ring is rarely about the diamond itself and almost never about engravings alone. Rings from this period were engineered around disciplined proportions, controlled geometry, and restrained metal execution that counterfeit and hybrid mountings consistently fail to reproduce. Many examples appear convincing at first glance, but structural imbalance, incorrect elevation, crude prong work, or illogical undergallery construction quietly reveal non-genuine origins. Understanding how professionals evaluate Tiffany mountings matters because mounting authenticity defines identity, credibility, and risk exposure long before value is ever considered.
DJR Expert Guide Series, Vol. 1959 gives you a complete, beginner-friendly, non-destructive workflow for distinguishing real versus fake Tiffany & Co. pre-2000 engagement ring mountings using structural proportions and geometry. Using appraisal-forward, authentication-first observation—no tools, no disassembly, and no risky handling—you’ll learn the same proportional analysis logic professionals rely on when rendering defensible authenticity conclusions for high-risk legacy jewelry.
Inside this guide, you’ll learn how to:
Understand why mounting proportions matter more than logos or diamonds
Identify correct head-to-shank balance and taper
Evaluate diamond elevation for era-appropriate restraint
Analyze prong geometry, taper, and termination quality
Detect proportion errors that immediately expose replicas
Assess shank width, depth, and structural logic
Evaluate metal execution and authentic wear behavior
Inspect undergallery architecture and internal structure
Distinguish diamond authenticity from mounting authenticity
Use weight and hand feel as engineering indicators
Apply era-specific Tiffany design expectations correctly
Identify common hybrid and remount scenarios
Understand why authentication must precede appraisal
Recognize when professional authentication is warranted
Apply a quick-glance checklist before relying on markings or stones
Whether you are evaluating an engagement ring in person, reviewing photographs, managing an inherited piece, or preparing a ring for sale or insurance, this guide provides the professional structure needed to prioritize geometry and engineering over surface familiarity. This is the same proportion-first framework professionals use to authenticate pre-2000 Tiffany & Co. engagement ring mountings with confidence and defensibility.
Digital Download — PDF • 9 Pages • Instant Access
Authenticating a pre-2000 Tiffany & Co. engagement ring is rarely about the diamond itself and almost never about engravings alone. Rings from this period were engineered around disciplined proportions, controlled geometry, and restrained metal execution that counterfeit and hybrid mountings consistently fail to reproduce. Many examples appear convincing at first glance, but structural imbalance, incorrect elevation, crude prong work, or illogical undergallery construction quietly reveal non-genuine origins. Understanding how professionals evaluate Tiffany mountings matters because mounting authenticity defines identity, credibility, and risk exposure long before value is ever considered.
DJR Expert Guide Series, Vol. 1959 gives you a complete, beginner-friendly, non-destructive workflow for distinguishing real versus fake Tiffany & Co. pre-2000 engagement ring mountings using structural proportions and geometry. Using appraisal-forward, authentication-first observation—no tools, no disassembly, and no risky handling—you’ll learn the same proportional analysis logic professionals rely on when rendering defensible authenticity conclusions for high-risk legacy jewelry.
Inside this guide, you’ll learn how to:
Understand why mounting proportions matter more than logos or diamonds
Identify correct head-to-shank balance and taper
Evaluate diamond elevation for era-appropriate restraint
Analyze prong geometry, taper, and termination quality
Detect proportion errors that immediately expose replicas
Assess shank width, depth, and structural logic
Evaluate metal execution and authentic wear behavior
Inspect undergallery architecture and internal structure
Distinguish diamond authenticity from mounting authenticity
Use weight and hand feel as engineering indicators
Apply era-specific Tiffany design expectations correctly
Identify common hybrid and remount scenarios
Understand why authentication must precede appraisal
Recognize when professional authentication is warranted
Apply a quick-glance checklist before relying on markings or stones
Whether you are evaluating an engagement ring in person, reviewing photographs, managing an inherited piece, or preparing a ring for sale or insurance, this guide provides the professional structure needed to prioritize geometry and engineering over surface familiarity. This is the same proportion-first framework professionals use to authenticate pre-2000 Tiffany & Co. engagement ring mountings with confidence and defensibility.
Digital Download — PDF • 9 Pages • Instant Access
Image 1 of 1