Image 1 of 1
DJR Expert Guide Series, Vol. 1432 — How to Decide If an Item Deserves Further Attention
One of the earliest and most consequential decisions in appraisal and authentication work occurs before any deep analysis begins: determining whether an item is even worth pursuing. Professionals routinely face pressure to escalate based on curiosity, narrative strength, or client insistence, despite evidence quality, market relevance, or risk exposure failing to justify further effort. Understanding how to decide if an item deserves further attention matters because disciplined triage protects time, limits liability, controls cost, and prevents over-investment in low-probability outcomes where escalation would increase exposure without improving accuracy.
DJR Expert Guide Series, Vol. 1432 gives you a complete, appraisal-forward, authentication-first, non-destructive framework for deciding when deeper evaluation is warranted—and when restraint is the most responsible professional outcome. Using structured triage logic, evidence sufficiency screening, and risk-versus-relevance analysis—no guarantees, no speculative escalation, and no destructive handling—you’ll learn the same professional decision filters experts use to allocate attention deliberately and defensibly.
Inside this guide, you’ll learn how to:
Understand why triage is a core professional skill
Screen items before escalation using high-level indicators
Identify early signals that justify further attention
Recognize stopping points that professionals respect
Weigh evidence density against narrative strength
Assess material and construction compatibility quickly
Align attention with market context and intended use
Evaluate risk versus reward before committing resources
Avoid escalation driven by curiosity or client pressure
Document triage decisions defensibly
Communicate “not worth pursuing” professionally
Apply a quick-glance checklist to decide when stopping is correct
Whether you’re reviewing submissions, advising clients, evaluating collections, or protecting professional credibility, this guide provides the structured framework experts rely on to treat attention as an investment—not an obligation—and to recognize that deciding not to proceed is a valid professional outcome.
Digital Download — PDF • 9 Pages • Instant Access
One of the earliest and most consequential decisions in appraisal and authentication work occurs before any deep analysis begins: determining whether an item is even worth pursuing. Professionals routinely face pressure to escalate based on curiosity, narrative strength, or client insistence, despite evidence quality, market relevance, or risk exposure failing to justify further effort. Understanding how to decide if an item deserves further attention matters because disciplined triage protects time, limits liability, controls cost, and prevents over-investment in low-probability outcomes where escalation would increase exposure without improving accuracy.
DJR Expert Guide Series, Vol. 1432 gives you a complete, appraisal-forward, authentication-first, non-destructive framework for deciding when deeper evaluation is warranted—and when restraint is the most responsible professional outcome. Using structured triage logic, evidence sufficiency screening, and risk-versus-relevance analysis—no guarantees, no speculative escalation, and no destructive handling—you’ll learn the same professional decision filters experts use to allocate attention deliberately and defensibly.
Inside this guide, you’ll learn how to:
Understand why triage is a core professional skill
Screen items before escalation using high-level indicators
Identify early signals that justify further attention
Recognize stopping points that professionals respect
Weigh evidence density against narrative strength
Assess material and construction compatibility quickly
Align attention with market context and intended use
Evaluate risk versus reward before committing resources
Avoid escalation driven by curiosity or client pressure
Document triage decisions defensibly
Communicate “not worth pursuing” professionally
Apply a quick-glance checklist to decide when stopping is correct
Whether you’re reviewing submissions, advising clients, evaluating collections, or protecting professional credibility, this guide provides the structured framework experts rely on to treat attention as an investment—not an obligation—and to recognize that deciding not to proceed is a valid professional outcome.
Digital Download — PDF • 9 Pages • Instant Access